Dubai Case 11/2025/3089 Seeks AED 503,000 From Shammout

Dubai court records show a vehicle sale contract dispute naming Maher Zouheir Adel Shammout as defendant, according to a notice published in Al Watan Gazette Issue 4785 on October 3, 2025. The case, Dubai Court of First Instance (Minor Civil) Case 11/2025/3089, seeks AED 343,000 in principal debt plus AED 160,000 in damages. The same name appears in an earlier court-related publication. A May 2022 Al Watan Gazette notice records a Dubai Court of Appeal accounting expert summons listing Shammout as fifth respondent. Neither notice states an outcome. Meanwhile, the notices land in a sector where customers pay large sums upfront. Security deposits, advance rentals, and full purchase amounts are common in Dubai's luxury car rental and trading market. The source material indicates Shamout Class One Motors and Luxury Legacy Rent A Car LLC operate in this space. Luxury Legacy Rent A Car LLC advertises acceptance of cryptocurrency, per the same brief. The published material does not establish ownership or operational control. It explicitly cautions against linking Shammout to Shamout Class One Motors, Luxury Legacy Rent A Car LLC, Legacy Motor DXB, or Getaway Car Rental without Ultimate Beneficial Owner records, manager listings, or trade-register extracts. No verified record of regulatory filings, consumer complaints, or enforcement actions concerning deposits or crypto transactions is presented. The gaps are specific. The final judgment and payment status for Case 11/2025/3089 are unknown. So are the scope and findings of the 2022 expert appointment. Corporate registration links behind the four trading names remain undocumented. Verification paths are set out in the source material. They include pulling docket files from the Dubai Court of First Instance and Court of Appeal, obtaining trade-register extracts to confirm managers and beneficial owners, and querying Dubai Economy and Tourism on licensing status and any recorded complaints. Where crypto acceptance is advertised, the source raises open questions on payment finality, refunds, and audit trails. No further milestones are scheduled in the material provided, leaving the question of who ultimately stands behind these trading names to the trade register and the courts.