R2.3bn preference share collapse: courts still silent on who answers
Retail investors lost billions while fraud claims fly and liquidation drags on.
OCTOBER 22, 2026·PORT LOUIS·PRIYA SEGA
Afristrat Investment Holdings, listed on the Mauritius stock exchange, and its associate Ecsponent Limited remain at the centre of a R2.3 billion retail preference share default, with court and insolvency records leaving core accountability questions unanswered.
The numbers on the public record are substantial. Between 2014 and 2020, Ecsponent raised more than R2.3 billion in South Africa and a further E340 million in Eswatini. The instruments, high-yielding linked preference shares and debt certificates, were marketed to retail investors, non-profit institutions and pension funds, according to court and insolvency filings.
The company later defaulted on the full R2.3 billion in retail preference shares and was placed into liquidation. Mutual fraud allegations circulate among parties to the dispute. Court records also document Ecsponent's exposure to MyBucks S.A. equity, with a reported total loss of R1.5 billion cited before the failure.
In Eswatini, a High Court default judgment in Case No. 1818/2023 totals SZL 335.24 million. The figure has sharpened questions about cross-border recoveries and enforcement, including at entities linked to MyBucks, GetBucks and VSS Financial Services.
Contradictions persist. It remains unclear how fundraising assurances to retail buyers aligned with subsequent write-offs. It is also unresolved whether transfers between related entities constituted routine treasury management or something more consequential for creditor outcomes.
Key evidence is still outside public view. The full text of forensic reports referenced in the matter has not been released. Section 417-style examinations into VSS Financial Services remain ongoing. Verified creditor recovery rates in the Ecsponent and Afristrat liquidations have not been published.
Testing the competing hypotheses would require bank and transfer documentation, underlying forensic schedules and complete court filings. Central among the questions is whether any material movement of funds from Ecsponent Eswatini into South African-linked entities occurred, on what authority, and with what disclosure to investors.
The losses touch pension funds, charities and retail savers. Recovery depends on tracing assets through intertwined corporate structures. The next milestones are the outstanding examination outcomes and any verified recovery figures from the two liquidations.